PATIENTS' PERCEPTION OF RECOVERY AFTER CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS: AN IMPORTANT INDICATOR OF LIFESTYLE CHANGE

Authors

  • Nazila Javadi-Pashaki 1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. 2. Department of Nursing, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-946X
  • Mohammad Javad Ghazanfari Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3555-6044
  • Samad Karkhah 1. Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. 2. Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-9176

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55i1.2247

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of premature death in the world.1 Recent advances in medical technology have led to lower mortality and better relative recovery in CVD patients. Today, various invasive procedures are used in cardiovascular interventions such as percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), which have led to improvements in the outcomes of CVD patients. However, despite the benefits of cardiovascular interventions, patients need to change their lifestyles. Therefore, patients with CVD need rehabilitation after cardiovascular interventions for complete recovery, which is often overlooked.2

Meanwhile, patients' perception of recovery after cardiovascular interventions is one of the key factors in predicting lifestyle changes in CVD patients. These patients should have a full awareness of a healthy lifestyle about physical activity, alcohol and tobacco use, and diet, as well as a proper perception of recovery after cardiovascular interventions.3 Hence, the results of a randomized controlled trial in the UK that assessed the impact of educational and rehabilitation programs on patients 'perceptions after myocardial infarction (MI) showed that educational and rehabilitation programs can lead to positive changes in patients' perceptions of recovery after cardiovascular interventions and lifestyle after MI, especially after three months of intervention. Also, patients in the intervention group reported fewer symptoms of angina compared to patients in the control group. Overall, educational and rehabilitation programs were effective in changing the perception of CVD patients and improving the functional outcome of patients after MI.4 In contrast, the results of another study in the Netherlands that evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention on CVD risk indicators in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia showed that there was no significant improvement between the intervention and control groups (usual care).5

The importance of this issue becomes clearer when these patients undergo invasive cardiovascular interventions. Despite the benefits of cardiovascular interventions, patients need to change their lifestyles. On the other hand, there is a link between patients' perceptions of recovery after cardiovascular interventions and lifestyle changes. Therefore, there is a need for serious attention to patients' perception of recovery after cardiovascular interventions. Obviously, patients' perceptions of recovery after cardiovascular interventions can be an important predictor of their lifestyle changes. However, to our knowledge, studies in this field are very limited. Therefore, it is suggested that researchers in future studies pay special attention to the perception of CVD patients of recovery after cardiovascular interventions as an important predictor of lifestyle changes in them after cardiovascular interventions.

References

  1. Woringer M, Nielsen JJ, Zibarras L, Evason J, Kassianos AP, Harris M, et al. Development of a questionnaire to evaluate patients’ awareness of cardiovascular disease risk in England’s National Health Service Health Check preventive cardiovascular programme. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014413.
  2. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Euro Intervention. 2013;8(11):1242-51.
  3. Organization WH. Technical package for cardiovascular disease management in primary health care: healthy-lifestyle counselling. World Health Organization; 2018.
  4. Petrie KJ, Cameron LD, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(4):580-6.
  5. Broekhuizen K, van Poppel MN, Koppes LL, Kindt I, Brug J, van Mechelen W. No significant improvement of cardiovascular disease risk indicators by a lifestyle intervention in people with familial hypercholesterolemia compared to usual care: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(1):1-9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

1.
Javadi-Pashaki N, Ghazanfari MJ, Karkhah S. PATIENTS’ PERCEPTION OF RECOVERY AFTER CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS: AN IMPORTANT INDICATOR OF LIFESTYLE CHANGE. Pak Heart J [Internet]. 2022Mar.25 [cited 2024Apr.19];55(1):94-5. Available from: https://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/2247

Issue

Section

Special Communication