COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF CALCIFIED AND NON-CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY LESION INTERVENTION UNDER IVUS GUIDANCE -AN EXPERIENCE FROM A SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRY, PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Ihsanullah Ihsanullah Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Nasir Rahman Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Nasir Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Ghufran Adnan Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Awais Farhad Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Yawer Saeed Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Maria Khan Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55iSupplement1.2442

Abstract

Objectives: Intralesional coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an important prognostic marker in terms of target lesion failure, target vessel revascularization and clinical outcomes. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) plays a pivotal role in the optimal management of calcified coronary arteries. We aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of IVUS guided intervention of calcified coronary lesions in a South Asian country.

Methodology: We retrospectively studied a total of 134 consecutive patients, who underwent IVUS guided assessment of coronary arteries from January 2013 to March 2020 at a single center. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with coronary artery calcification (CAC, n=77) and without coronary artery calcification (non-CAC, n=57). The mean duration of follow-up was 40.3 ± 30.1 months. The two groups were compared based on their clinical characteristics, management, in-hospital events, follow-up, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) that included cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, life-threatening arrhythmia, bleeding, heart failure, stroke, and target vessel revascularization.

Results: A total of 134 patients were included who had undergone IVUS and were divided into two groups patients with CAC (n=77) and non-CAC (n=57). Majority of the patients were male (n=97 [72.3%]), the mean age at presentation was 63.1 ± 12.9 years. In CAC group the most common risk factor was Age of the patient then dyslipidemia (n=68[88%] followed by hypertension (n=64[83%]) and diabetes mellitus (n=44[57%]), CAC group patients were more commonly presented with acute coronary syndrome (n=59[76.6%]), had prior PCI (n=40[52%]), had more LM disease (n=34 [44%], p=value 0.005), significant number of prior stent-ISR (n=27[47%]) p=0.024. Having CAC is associated with higher MACE (17 out of 26 events).

Conclusion: Patients with CAC have more comorbidities and more commonly present with acute coronary syndrome. MACEs were recorded higher in the CAC group although the results are not statistically significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-17

How to Cite

1.
Ihsanullah I, Rahman N, Nasir A, Adnan G, Farhad A, Saeed Y, Khan M. COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF CALCIFIED AND NON-CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY LESION INTERVENTION UNDER IVUS GUIDANCE -AN EXPERIENCE FROM A SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRY, PAKISTAN. Pak Heart J [Internet]. 2022Nov.17 [cited 2024Dec.24];55(Supplement1):S26. Available from: https://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/2442