IS 3D TRANSTHORACIC PLANIMETRY STILL SUPERIOR OVER 2D ECHO IN RHEUMATIC MITRAL STENOSIS WHEN BOTH AREA AND HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS OF SEVERITY ARE IN QUESTION?

Authors

  • Muhammad Ali Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology
  • Muhammad Asad
  • Khurram Abbas Rawal Institute of Health Sciences
  • Anum Umair Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology
  • Sadia Saeed Subhani Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology
  • Rehana Khadim Army Medical College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47144/phj.v55i1.2196

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to compare transthoracic 3D planimetry to 2D planimetry in calculating mitral valve area along with correlation of various echocardiographic parameters of severity of mitral stenosis among these modalities.

Methodology: Patients with (RMS) were enrolled. Keeping 2D PHT as reference mitral valve area (MVA) was calculated and it was compared to the results derived by transthoracic 2D and 3D planimetry. Agreement between the 2D and 3D methods was assessed by measuring the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: 51 patients were included. 36 (70.6%) were females; mean age was 33 ± 6 years. Mean gradient was 14.5 ± 3.9 mmhg while mean Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was 31.6 ± 6 mmhg. MVA’s derived by PHT, 3D planimetry, and 2D were 1.04 ± 0.24, 1.07 ± 0.24, 1.21 ± 0.27 cm2 respectively. 3D obtained areas were significantly lower compared to 2D (p< 0.001) and insignificantly greater from PHT (p = 0.18). 3D demonstrated best agreement with MVA PHT (95% limits of agreement: 0.67 to 0.92; ICC 0.84). MVA 3D planimetry and MVA 2D correlated well with PASP and mean pressure gradient but showed weak correlation with left atrium size.

Conclusion: 3D planimetry derived mitral area compared to 2D echocardiography are more in line with PHT calculated area and correlates well to hemodynamic parameters of severity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Ali, Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology

Assistant Professor  , Cardiology department

Khurram Abbas, Rawal Institute of Health Sciences

Assistant professor, Cardioloy Department

Anum Umair, Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology

House Officer, Cardiology Department

Sadia Saeed Subhani , Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology

Registrar, Cardiology Department

Rehana Khadim, Army Medical College

Managing Editor, Research department

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

1.
Ali M, Asad M, Abbas K, Umair A, Subhani SS, Khadim R. IS 3D TRANSTHORACIC PLANIMETRY STILL SUPERIOR OVER 2D ECHO IN RHEUMATIC MITRAL STENOSIS WHEN BOTH AREA AND HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS OF SEVERITY ARE IN QUESTION?. Pak Heart J [Internet]. 2022Mar.25 [cited 2024Apr.18];55(1):41-6. Available from: https://pakheartjournal.com/index.php/pk/article/view/2196

Issue

Vol. 55 No. 1 (2022): Pakistan Heart Journal

Section

Original Article

License

When an article is accepted for publication in the print format, the author will be required to transfer exclusive copyright to the PHJ and retain the rights to use and share their published article with others. However, re-submission of the full article or any part for publication by a third party would require prior permission of the PHJ.

Online publication will allow the author to retain the copyright and share the article under the agreement described in the licensing rights with creative commons, with appropriate attribution to PHJ. Creative Commons attribution license CC BY 4.0 is applied to articles published in PHJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/